It's very difficult to switch to news these days. A lot happens on TV. Crimes, Climate crisis, civil unrest, bloodshed and what not. You just can't open X anymore if you get your news from there(speaking from experience, not worth the time and mental drain and the propaganda). If you think about it, everything feels like a house of cards. One bad day, and the entirety of world going down. Everyday edging towards a new apocalypse. Doomsday clock being set to milliseconds. It all feels like we are just on the brink of extinction now. And we are just LUCKY that we are still here. But wait a second. Lucky for 2000 years? Math doesn't work out. (I know that human recorded history is more than 2000 years, I am making a huge assumption that there were peaceful times).It was roughly 80 years ago that we discovered the power of gods. And let's not mention every single account of monstrosity that has be fallen on us. Corona was just two years ago. Definitely not saying we are were we want to be(more on that later), but still. We kept going on? Can't be sheer luck. And it definitely isn't.
Cake
How do we choose people in power? Acumen and trust. Pretty straight forward. Simpler terms-
We have a cake. And we are 4 people, how do we decide how are we eating today? Let me tell you about the gang -
1. Person who is obviously in need of food and hungry, so we have to feed him more and he can't work as much as we do
2. Person who makes sure that we are getting cake.
3. Person who although doesn't get the cake, but takes care of person 2
Really not a fan of difficult words, the internet is full of it. This is a Youtube video giving you a rough idea of every political setup.
Let's start thinking,
My morality says I can't let anyone go hungry. I am a capable person and I have to be capable enough that I don't starve someone who just couldn't contribute as much as I could.
Really great monologue, I value this man but I don't want to be around him. When you let your intrusive thoughts win, you will realise that it's lot more efficient to feed the one who is getting the cake everyday. And more to the person3 who makes people like person2. But shall we succumb to efficiency when we are talking about human lives? And we forget a major point here, what if someone else feeds person 1? How cruel we have to be to think like that. But isn't that the case in the world?
Obviously there are sections of society. And there are huge differences in them. No fault of there own. That just happens(not exactly). And the people in power have ALWAYS pulled the trigger to get the bigger piece of cake for THEIR people. As soon as you read your first article on international relations, you will realize there are no morals in diplomacy what so ever.
But should there be? Winston Churchill is deemed as one of the greatest and most respected figures in history. If you associate with him, you will be very offended when you walk by someone who has known of Bengal Famine of 1943. It was Churchill who had the bloods of so many Indians on his hands because he treated them as pests. What reason do the so called 'person 1' has to hear to you after 80 years?
So when it comes to distribution of cake, people are generally paid in proportion of contribution to cake. This is called a meritocracy. Sam Harris explains it way better than I would ever will. In this episode of his podcast he also discusses a case for person 2, where as time progresses, the descendants of person 2 are going to be more well off than person 1. Better schools, better resources and what not. And person 1 has his survival at stake, he is more concerned about the fact that his child might not make it alive, because the hospital he can afford can’t save his kid if he gets pneumonia. Starting lines are very different. And that gets uglier and uglier with time because eventually person 2’s descendants would tag themselves as “better”. And person 1’s descendants would take wrong descisions out of “frustration” NOT because they are bad people(That is just everyone given the right circumstances).
Think about it, where does insurgency, civil unrest and what not stems from? Does that mean the cake goes to person 1? Well, it’s about time and amount of cake. Are you willing to take risks with the supply of cake? That’s for you to decide. It has nothing to do with person 1, given the right circumstances and resources, people have always proved themselves to be of use. Our privilege does scream out of our insides that “every human is different”, true. “But not by much”
It’s this case of who’s more ‘useful’(and fear that the other useful person would call me out when time comes) that has given India it’s caste system, USA it’s rampant racism, and every social divide you know of across the world. I don’t need to present resources to let you know how it has always ended.
Does that mean cake goes equally to everyone and we try to take care of everyone at the expense of fighting our own demons about how there is not much of a difference within us. What makes you think we didn’t try that?
мать
Analogy time,
The world’s up in flames. Fossil fuels are killing the planet everyday. You are in your office, you just can’t stop the use of fossil fuels. What are you going to explain people? Go back to candles and use chariots? But you can sweep it under the rug for now. Not like it’s happening today. 10 mad lads enter your office. They are like
Them: Sir, we can harness the power of the sun. We think these black panels will solve our problem. All we need is your help.
You: Wow, how can I help you!
Them: We need your resources.
You: Ok sure. Let’s Solve this.
You forgot something here. Something very critical. These are mad lads after all, they can fail, that too very miserably. How are you answering the people who are going to ask you about the resources you gave them and they failed. They have no reason to believe you if mad lads fail. You will be on streets and there would be someone else in the office next year. You can shun them, you have authority, you can get them jailed, beaten up and what not.Do you want to do that? But wait, it gets even more interesting.
Now there is a surge of mad lads. The first 10 told you about magical black plates. Let’s suppose few people even got it. Those who didn’t ,have their own crazy ideas and they are at your office everyday, me too, me too. You obviously don’t have enough. You shut down black plate mad lads for this. Because you believe in equality of opportunity. And history has told us it never guaranteed equality of outcomes. Did you forget the cake story?
But I used “mad lads” to describe people. One of them doesn’t give up. He does something about it. And now he has solved your issue. You congratulate him and ask for supplying this equally to everyone and make this world a better place. But he has more power than you now, he can just deny and leverage it to take over your office. Because he wasn’t given the cake when he asked for, his moral compass is already screwed. GUESS what happens.
And now you feel bad. You don’t like(and can’t do anything) about what mad lads did.And you had your own reasons because you can’t starve millions because of a few. And now mad lads are in power, and everyone feels like they are a person 1. And again, cake gets distributed according to contribution.
I haven’t linked a single reference here. I tried to turn it into a story. This is a fairy tale, we are assuming everyone here is a cutie. Rational, but not a bad person. Now think of all of this in context of every rich person we bash on. Them not paying taxes(IT’S WRONG), and people in power not being able to do anything about it because that’s where their power stems from. They shouldn’t be in power then, new people. What’s your alternate hypothesis? And before presenting it, remember it’s been 2000 years since this is going on. When it didn’t, we have ample evidence on how we starved everyone to death when we were being fair.This list of books made me think like this, not saying I am right. But, whole point of posting is getting comments which would change the way I think.
Take as much time as you want to think about what I said(and where exactly I was pointing). Because I mentioned how everyone is a cutie here. And a thing about cuties, they will at least try. Let’s switch gears now,
Egoistic Altruism
short example to explain -
Someone likes being around people. Someone likes it when people are nice to them. But they also know people do that because they are in a good mood. They are not a good person, They don’t care about what people feel and can’t relate to them mostly. But they know that other people around them being in a good mood is beneficial to them. What do you call this person? Selfish because they try to take care of people just so that they don’t have to see them on their bad days, so they try to manipulate their friends into doing good things for themselves so that this said person can at least have a little less load on their shoulder. Or selfless? Because they go lengths to do this thing strictly for other people. Because it is very implicit to explain what they are getting by investing in their friends(although selfish intents).
Long explanation -
Altruism, the selfless concern for the well-being of others, has long been regarded as a virtue that transcends individual interests. However, a fascinating and somewhat paradoxical concept has emerged in the realm of altruistic behavior — egoistic altruism. This term suggests that individuals, while ostensibly acting selflessly, may, in fact, be motivated by underlying egoistic desires. In this essay, we will delve into the intricate interplay between self-interest and compassion, exploring the psychological mechanisms that drive egoistic altruism.
Egoistic altruism challenges the traditional dichotomy between altruism and self-interest by positing that seemingly selfless acts may be driven by egoistic motives. Unlike genuine altruism, where individuals act solely for the benefit of others without any consideration for personal gain, egoistic altruism implies that individuals may engage in altruistic acts as a means to fulfill their own needs or desires.
The psychological roots of egoistic altruism lie in the complex interplay between innate human empathy and the pursuit of self-interest. Evolutionary psychology suggests that altruistic behaviors may have evolved as a mechanism to enhance the survival of both individuals and their communities. Consequently, individuals may engage in acts of kindness not only out of genuine concern for others but also because such behavior fosters social cohesion and reciprocal relationships, ultimately benefiting the altruist.
Furthermore, social psychology delves into the role of social norms and expectations in shaping altruistic behavior. Egoistic altruism may manifest when individuals conform to societal expectations, seeking approval or avoiding social censure. In these cases, the external appearance of altruism conceals the underlying egoistic motivations rooted in a desire for social acceptance.
Examples of egoistic altruism abound in both historical and contemporary contexts. Philanthropy, for instance, often involves the donation of substantial sums of money to charitable causes, showcasing a seemingly selfless act. However, the philanthropist may derive personal satisfaction, social recognition, or even tax benefits, revealing the egoistic underpinnings of their altruistic endeavors.
Similarly, public figures engaging in acts of charity or community service may be driven by a desire to enhance their public image, thereby securing support or popularity. In these instances, the apparent altruism serves as a means to fulfill personal goals, highlighting the complexity of human motivation.
The ethical implications of egoistic altruism raise questions about the authenticity of altruistic acts and the moral value assigned to them. Critics argue that the true essence of altruism lies in selfless intent, and any ulterior motives diminish the altruistic nature of an action. However, proponents of egoistic altruism contend that the pragmatic integration of self-interest and altruism can lead to more sustainable and effective philanthropy.
Egoistic altruism challenges simplistic notions of altruistic behavior by acknowledging the intricate interplay between self-interest and compassion. Understanding the psychological mechanisms behind egoistic altruism provides valuable insights into human behavior, shedding light on the nuanced motivations that drive seemingly selfless acts. While the debate over the authenticity of egoistic altruism continues, its recognition underscores the complex nature of human altruistic endeavors and invites a more nuanced approach to understanding and appreciating the motivations behind acts of kindness.
So the mad lads can do the right thing, and still be rational about it.
Does it work? Well talking in context of my country. There was a guy who revolutionized manufacturing forever. Ratan tata is a god to many young people around the world(including me). But there also have been beauty brands who ruined how women see themselves very badly, by introducing beauty standards which just don’t apply to the country. But oh boy, what can’t be achieved with marketing aggressive enough(Topic for some other day).
So, you can be very selfish ,but still be an asset to the world, but are YOU going to do it?
‘Uneducated’ leaders(but aren’t you educated?)
Huge problem around the world. Incapable people in power or they are straight up corrupt. In my country, hundreds of instances where people have no educational background, are racists, have even criminal records. But still they are in power. Why is that? They just don’t deserve it. It has to change. AGITATE! UNITE! Someone has to go against it! Who? Someone who is educated, who is smart, who wants good for people!
Hmmmmmm, I like how you think. YOU! You should do it! You are so called educated. Do it?
Did you feel that small chill? EXACTLY my point. Everything we blame our leaders for, starts with us. Can you do it? It’s relatively way easier to have protests and present theories and ask people to act on it. Hey! I am smart listen to me! Let’s see. You are SO smart that you decided to read a lot of things(not even that in most cases), you gathered your 100 friends, you posted about it, you tweeted about it. You put your life at risk to be a hero.
You are so smart, that this was your homework against something that has been perpetuating for 2000 years. And as for your context 1947 to today, has won against every single instance of a person feeling smart . And has worked with 0 breakdowns for several decades. Very smart. You could have tried to do the exact same thing systematically by steadily becoming a part of it and trying your smart there. At least you are in a democracy. You could have been such an asset but you decided to be a menace because of your half baked theories.
You compare yourself to the forefathers that established this nation and deserve nothing but respect and our gratitude every morning. This is the best you can do? Half baked “theories”. What about a stable implementation? This is my exact problem so many campus protests . Next time when someone asks you ‘oh this won’t work, please explain’ have the acumen to answer it. Instead of “get off my campus”
Theories may or may not work. Guns always do. So the world bows to people with power. They definitely have done a LOT of things that weren’t exactly smart, but needed. Don’t compete with someone you deem a monster with your human ethics and by being smart. Only monsters trump over monsters.
So next time when you look around yourself and blame the government and leaders for everything. Remember how YOU never tried to get involved even at the smallest level. And even if you did, your approach was half baked. And you are the one who brings bad name to people who actually do the right thing, because they are tagged as you, because of your immature approach(Their are PLENTY of student organizations who do commendable work, but it takes one smart person).
Being smart isn’t and was never enough. Having an unshakable will is much more important. It takes a very smart person to cause mayhem too. Good luck.
World has always come on top of actual threats. Everything goes down to drain because of hollow promises. Talking on a personal level, people telling you they hate you won’t cause panic on most days. But hollow promises of love gave the world a LOT of literature and pain. You aren’t superman, masquerading as one won’t do anyone any favor. Actions count, words don’t. It’s much more respectable to admit weaknesses where they lie and work on them. Especially your world views and what not(whole point of my writing is critical feedback).
Superman
DISCLAIMER: I am not claiming to be an expert on Neitzche’s work. I know very well that I don’t get many parts although I tried to read as much I could. So, if what I say makes sense to you. Good. It doesn’t, Sorry.
Friedrich Nietzsche, the 19th-century German philosopher, is renowned for his profound and often controversial ideas that have significantly influenced existentialism, nihilism, and postmodern thought. Two of his seminal works, "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" and "Beyond Good and Evil," delve into his complex philosophy that challenges traditional moral values, explores the concept of the Übermensch (Overman or Superman), and advocates for a reevaluation of societal norms. Surprisingly, within Nietzsche's seemingly esoteric and dense texts, there are insights that resonate with the contemporary self-help movement.
In "Thus Spoke Zarathustra," Nietzsche introduces the character of Zarathustra, a wise and enigmatic figure who descends from his mountain solitude to share his wisdom with humanity. One of the central themes is the idea of eternal recurrence, where life repeats infinitely. This concept serves as a powerful reminder to live life to the fullest and make choices as if they will be repeated eternally. In the realm of self-help, this notion aligns with the importance of mindfulness and intentional living. Nietzsche's words echo the idea that our actions today shape not only our present but also our future.
"Man is a rope, tied between beast and Übermensch—a rope over an abyss... What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end."
– "Thus Spoke Zarathustra"
This quote encapsulates Nietzsche's perspective on human evolution. The Übermensch, often misunderstood as a superior individual, is better understood as a symbol of human potential. It encourages personal growth and the continuous pursuit of self-improvement. In the context of self-help, Nietzsche challenges individuals to see themselves as bridges between their current state and their higher, evolved selves.
"Beyond Good and Evil" delves into the critique of conventional morality and the dichotomy of good and evil. Nietzsche argues that these moral distinctions are socially constructed and that individuals should transcend such limiting frameworks. This perspective has relevance to self-help, encouraging people to question societal expectations and cultivate a moral compass based on personal values rather than external norms.
"He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you."
– "Beyond Good and Evil"
This quote emphasizes the potential dangers of battling external forces and losing one's essence in the process. In the realm of self-help, it warns against succumbing to negativity or becoming consumed by external challenges. It advocates for maintaining one's integrity and authenticity in the face of adversity.
Nietzsche's philosophy often explores the idea of embracing struggle and suffering as integral to personal growth. In "Thus Spoke Zarathustra," he declares the importance of embracing challenges to become stronger. This resonates with the self-help ethos that views adversity as an opportunity for resilience and personal development.
"What does not destroy me, makes me stronger." – "Thus Spoke Zarathustra"
This famous aphorism encapsulates Nietzsche's emphasis on the transformative power of adversity. In a self-help context, it encourages individuals to view setbacks as opportunities for strength and resilience, fostering a mindset of growth and empowerment.
While Nietzsche's philosophy may not align with all aspects of modern self-help, the resonance between his ideas and certain themes within the self-help movement is undeniable. The call for individual autonomy, the pursuit of personal growth, and the acknowledgment of life's challenges as opportunities for development are threads that connect Nietzsche's profound reflections with the enduring quest for self-improvement. Whether one embraces or challenges his ideas, Nietzsche's impact on philosophy and his unexpected relevance to contemporary self-help discourse cannot be ignored.
Why we started talking about you taking care of yourselves before the world? Well, look around you. Do you ask your friends who are already in a crisis to help you? Forget what you should and shouldn’t do, let’s focus on what you actually do. Same applies to the world. The only and the best contribution you can make to the world and yourselves is being in a better and sustainable state. So next time you decide to root out the systems that are older than trees(Here Jordan Peterson mentions how dominance hierarchies can be found in crustaceans too. And lobsters are older than trees on evolutionary scale), make sure you are hydrated and well fed.
Take care comrade ;).
This is going to take a lot of editing, because most of it was written on redbull. I am sorry if it got too incoherent or if there are mistakes in formatting.
This week I discovered another Indian underground artist’s pre-famous work. After that he became a celebrity, but let’s not forget where he came from. Introducing Paradox from UP, India.
Adios!